this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
162 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

13325 readers
449 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Every time I read this my heart breaks for the families. Of course the driver was in his seventies. Of course the police will never question if he took meds forbidding him to operate heavy machinery.

Edit: took it down. Did not see someone fast faster than I I

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

stat turned out to be per mile when I looked it up, edited original comment

eg: https://www.nhtsa.gov/book/countermeasures-that-work/young-drivers

[–] misterztrite@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From your link "Except for drivers 80 years and older, per mile driven, young drivers are more involved in fatal crashes than older drivers." and the stat "5.4 for drivers 80+".

Those stats also was about drivers involved in a fatal crash. It doesn't mention if the driver killed themselves or a pedestrian.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, and the driver in question was 70. Meanwhile, drivers 16-20 make up only 5 annual cohorts compared to almost two decades of cohorts in 80+, and the population of 80+ drivers is very small. The absolute risk we face as a society from young drivers is astronomically larger than the 80+, even though they do get in more accidents per km, but older drivers get a disproportional amount of hate. There is confirmation bias and motivated reasoning happening.

If you are willing to assume that elderly drivers are more likely to die in a crash than young drivers, and you don't care about consequences to the driver causing the crash, then that only makes the stats more damning against young drivers.

[–] misterztrite@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I think you got that backwards. My theory which I have no stats for is that young drivers are more likely to kill themselves and older drivers are more likely to kill pedestrians and crash into buildings.