this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
14 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1635 readers
125 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I probably have a pretty naive / 2 dimensional understanding of politics but, I just don't understand Nampijinpa Price.

I'm not particularly well informed as to the plight of first nations peoples, but my understanding was that their interests are better aligned with progressive parties with social policies.

From her wiki:

Price's activism and views focus primarily on issues faced by Aboriginal communities, and she is a vocal advocate for conservative Aboriginal politics in Australia. She has highlighted the high rates of domestic and other violence in Aboriginal communities, and advocates for a law and order approach. She is critical of welfare dependency and "opportunistic collectivism". She opposed the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament, and thinks that calls to change Australia Day and the Australian flag are counterproductive to Aboriginal advancement.

All of these positions are more or less the opposite of the positions I would expect aboriginal people to take up.

The best I can surmise, is that her views are indeed a rarity amongst First Nations People, and because of that she's a highly desirable member for conservative parties to kind of have their policies "blessed" by a token First Nations Woman.

Is it really that simple? Or am I missing something ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

The Minefield, ABC Listen

I've been listening to this weeks Minefield and considering their topic as an emotional driver for different actors here and internationally.

Price's actions in relation to ego and "saving face" from those embarrassments, and/or the need to dominate opponents, perceived and real, in reaction to their internal view of themselves and their identified 'side'.

I think its helping me, you might find their discussion insightful as well.