Programming

22709 readers

226 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

UlrikHD@programming.dev

I'm getting started with functional programming, which language would you recommend? (gregtech.eu)

submitted 6 days ago by lena@gregtech.eu to c/programming@programming.dev

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Specifically, I'm interested in BEAM, but I'm not sure if I should go for Elixir or Gleam. What seems cool about Gleam is that it has static typing.

I have no experience with functional programming at all btw

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bad code will be unreadable in any language of course.

Yeah I'm talking about good code, or at least not bad code. Let's not "no true Scotsman" this.

Even for good code you don't need syntax highlighting to easily see which identifiers are function names and which are their parameters in Rust.

[–] AbelianGrape@beehaw.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I don't need syntax highlighting for that in Haskell either. My usual highlighting just leaves them both in the default text color.

And I'm specifically arguing that the other things on your list do not inherently make code bad.