this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
120 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

2596 readers
146 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Both being unsafe seems the most probably state of things.

Still, something unsafe can still be safer than every other option ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] monogram@feddit.nl -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Why choose if there are other solutions ~~(like tuta)~~ that use open standards

[–] loudwhisper@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago

What open standard (that are not used by proton too)? If anything proton uses GPG while tuta uses a custom system (which is why they also encrypt the subject).

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Proton does PGP for you. There are countless standards compliant mail services where you could use your own email client and do your own PGP -Thunderbird is probably the easiest but It’s a trade-off.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Tuta also locks you down with their lack of IMAP support. You can only use their client. At least Proton has a bridge and allows you to use your own GPG key.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

I thought proton was the only one with a lack of imap, thanks for the info