this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)

Peertube

2561 readers
1 users here now

A free software to take back control of your videos

Peertube is an open, federated alternative to Youtube without advertising or tracking. On this site, you can find a good Peertube instance, with good rules, good moderation and most importantly a friendly community.

https://joinpeertube.org/

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This brainstorm is motivated by two recent discussions:

When is it time to switch away from youtube?

Lemmy community feedback: Should we fetch and combine comments from cross-posts on the post screen? · Issue #3415 · LemmyNet/lemmy-ui


The conversations about YouTube alternatives and PeerTube’s limitations made me test the current state of Lemmy <--> PeerTube federation.

Federation already works quite well: you can pull in PeerTube channels, subscribe, upvote, and comment from Lemmy.

But I did notice one thing. Take this Techlore video on PeerTube:

https://techlore.tv/w/9a7d20d2-4cc1-4911-8fd7-0794d8fe3bd9

-> On PeerTube: 6 upvotes, 4 comments

I pulled the video into my instance and was able to upvote it from there, so federated voting is working well: https://mander.xyz/post/37959974

I then noticed it had also been cross-posted to lemmy.world: https://lemmy.world/post/35205985

-> On lemmy.world: 37 upvotes, 9 comments

So the cross-post has significantly more engagement than the original video. This highlights a visibility issue: PeerTube creators may be getting more reach than they realize, but that engagement is fragmented across federated posts.


Brainstorm

Would it make sense to allow cross-posting of already-federated PeerTube content without breaking the link to the original object?

Upvotes/likes: These could be funneled back into the original PeerTube video, so creators get a true sense of their reach.

Comments: Less clear. Should all comments be merged into the video thread, or should they remain scoped to the Lemmy community they were posted in?

I don’t think this is “GitHub issue” ready, but it seems worth discussing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atmk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm going to copy a suggestion I made on their forum here:

Dear PeerTube team,

I’m writing to you because I’ve thought of a business move I think you should consider, and I’d be curious to hear your thoughts.

I follow several content creators on YouTube who have created their own, monetized streaming platform (Nebula) in order to escape Google’s monopolistic business model. While they are a community of creators and are forced to spend money on developing a streaming site, you have developed a streaming network and are trying to attract communities of creators. I’d like to suggest that you approach them and invite them to port their platform to the PeerTube network. Since building a realistic YouTube contender is in both of your interests, I expect they would be quite open to joining forces.

The only technical change needed to acommodate their needs would be to add into PeerTube the ability to paywall channels (Nebula is a paid subscription). While I understand that paywalls might be against the tastes of an open source platform, it would be a pragmatic move, as getting the Nebula content creators to move to PeerTube would benefit all parties:

  1. The content creators from Nebula — by moving to PeerTube, would be spared the financial and logistical stress of maintaining their own video streaming website, and be freer to focus on creating content.

  2. The PeerTube network — Would gain many new, non-technical viewers who are willing to pay for things (as they are all currently paying for Nebula). The viewers and their money would spill over to existing PT creators. What’s more, the Nebula youtubers who are already encouraging people to leave YouTube would now be doing your job of popularizing PeerTube for you.

  3. Nebula viewers — would now have a wider choice of apps (PT clients) through which to watch their Nebula videos.

I would be curious to hear your thoughts.

Kind regards,

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People who make videos on Nebula, usually also publish on YT. Publishing the same videos on PT should be fine, and some people who make linux videos are already doing that.

However, making videos takes time, money and effort, so how would the compensation work on PT? For many people, making videos is more than just a hobby.

People on Nebula may also have exclusive some videos (Nebula Originals), so I think keeping those on Nebula is the only realistic option. People who want to see those videos, can pay for Nebula, and support the channels they like that way.

[–] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Well the idea would be for Nebula to become a PT instance that HS a paywall I guess?