this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
37 points (97.4% liked)
Technology
75300 readers
6389 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thanks for the analysis and comparisons. I agree that the spotlight was too much on the image compression which is not really the main advantage of this rendering technique.
My main takeaway from this video was not that this should be used for image compression but that this is viable for 3D scene rendering in real time. Yes, the compression is impressive vs JPEG but there are better image formats with better compression... however this technique is done in real time so the processing speed is viable for 3D scene rendering.
I feel like most people are comparing only quality vs file size but speed should also be a big factor in those comparisons.