this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
754 points (96.7% liked)

Political Memes

9469 readers
4941 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] valtia@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just because you can't hear the dog whistle does not mean it doesn't exist. The thing with Groypers, and many white nationalists over the past decade, is that they're full of ironic memes, co-opting liberal media, and hidden language as a tactic to confuse people like you into believing they're not an extremist movement at all

[–] MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm not saying the shooter definitely isn't a groyper or whatnot, I'm saying that meme forensics seem a bit of an odd way to definitively decalre someone in one group or another.

Especially when that group is really transphobic and your romantic partner is trans.

I dunno but it strikes me like anyone declaring they know this guy's motivations one way or the other is probably just seeing what they want to see.

Edit: Okay, and now they've released the text exchanges and stuff. Seems pretty darned clear he's Left wing, not Right. (Can you really imagine a far Right killing Kirk would be doing so because they "had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out" ?)

https://atty.utahcounty.gov/cms/uploads/TJR_Information_49872215e3.pdf

[–] valtia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Can you really imagine a far Right killing Kirk would be doing so because they “had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out” ?

Yeah I can actually. A young white man radicalized by years of being terminally online in groyper spaces who already hated Charlie Kirk for not being extreme enough, who then started to date a trans woman (if the feds are to be believed on this at all). All the trans romantic partner angle gives is a more clear motive, but doesn't actually explain his radicalization to the point of a targeted killing. Being a groyper does.

[–] MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

To each their own I guess. This sounds like really motivated reasoning, in that you started with the end you want and then worked backwards. Right now, your hope is that the shooter is actually a fan of Fuentes despite being in a transgender relationship, despite being on the more extreme side is saying he's doing it because some hate can't be negotiated out (implying that he's actually calling for more hatred and naming it as such, which most folks on these sides don't do) while ignoring his parents claims that he's getting more into Left wing politics.

Or, y'know, a kid who intended to get away with it, wrote some memes from a semi plausible group on bullets in an attempt to blame the Far Right.

I'm not saying your version is impossible but it does beggar belief. It's like when my uncle defends trump and invokes all manner of wild conspiracies to do so, what he's saying isn't impossible it just requires a bunch of wild coincidences etc.

[–] valtia@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Not really, but this seems more like projection to me.

There is only thing I know for sure and it's that the shooter wasn't a leftist. There is nothing about him that suggests him being a leftist, and certainly nothing that would suggest he's been radicalized to the point of a targeted killing by the left. The only thing you have to go on is what the state and federal investigators say they have, which they obtained through a source they didn't name.