this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
180 points (83.3% liked)

Technology

75201 readers
4142 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
180
Vibe coding has turned senior devs into ‘AI babysitters,’ but they say it’s worth it | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)
submitted 2 days ago by kinther@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
101 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI is, despite being called "intelligent", not learning anything from its mistakes

Don't they also train new models on past user conversations?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Considering how many AI models still can't correctly count how many 'r' there are in "strawberry", I doubt it. There's also the seahorse emoji doing the rounds at the moment, you'd think that the models would get "smart" after repeatedly failing and realize it's an emoji that has never existed in the first place.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Chatgpt5 can count the number of 'r's, but that's probably because it has been specifically trained to do so.

I would argue that the models do learn, but only over generations. So slowly and specifically.

They definitely don't learn intelligently.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the P in ChatGPT: Pre-trained. It has "learned" based on the set of data it has been trained on, but prompts will not have it learn anything. Your past prompts are kept to use as "memory" and to influence output for your future prompts, but it does not actually learn from them.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The next generation of GPT will include everyone's past prompts (ever been A/B tested on openAI?). That's what I mean by generational learning.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Maybe. It's probably not high quality training data for the most part, though.