this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
227 points (98.3% liked)

PC Gaming

12291 readers
857 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Epzillon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It feels very nice knowing that my assumption was not completely bonkers. Thanks for confirming my sanity ๐Ÿ™

Although, then I wonder, what is even the purpose of Vanguard apart from data collection? Because this attack-vector clearly negates the entire purpose of Vanguard.

[โ€“] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Epzillon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. I know. Even though I hate Riot I guess some part of me wanted to believe their garbage anti-cheat wasn't ONLY a harvester for private data

[โ€“] Anivia@feddit.org 1 points 22 hours ago

Well, it probably also saves them a lot of money to only maintain a single anticheat system for both Valorant and League, compared to the 2 independent ones they had before