this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025

83 points (97.7% liked)

Linux

9445 readers

502 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

83

Ubuntu 25.10's Rust Coreutils Transition Has Uncovered Performance Shortcomings (www.phoronix.com)

submitted 4 days ago by cm0002@piefed.world to c/linux@programming.dev

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Samueru_sama@programming.dev 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

fair, in that case the comparison is even since busybox provides a shell, awk, grep, wget among other 395 utils, uutils it is 115.

[–] BatmanAoD@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I really don't think these are clearly comparable. I would rather see two more similar projects with comparable functionality that are both attempting to optimize for program binary size.

[–] Samueru_sama@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

Well if you still insist. Just went to check how big is the GNU coreutils as a single static binary, it is 2.3 MiB in size

check it out: https://pkgs.pkgforge.dev/repo/bincache/x86_64-linux/coreutils/nixpkgs/coreutils/