this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
656 points (98.8% liked)
Fuck AI
4115 readers
977 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I wouldn't be surprised if a significant portion of that 29% that say it's good for productivity are managers or business owners.
Or they haven't realized increased perceived productivity is a bad thing. The goalpost is always moving for demanded worker productivity. Oh the invention of the computer can increase productivity by 100 times? No, you're not getting a less work utopia, instead, guess how much productivity you're now expected to produce? Oh the invention of the internet can increase productivity by 1000 times? Oh shoot, guess ya gotta get back to work to make those gains!!!
You can compare productivity to wage gains since the 80s. It's quite bleak.
It's just like Adam Blumpied always used to say.....
BACK TO WORK, DICKHEAD!
Says you. I just got back from a trip where I watched a lady hand key 100 workers hand written time cards into a computer system. I’m sure that person would be much more content if she wasn’t sitting in a cave all day slowly giving herself carpal tunnel.
The better way would be to leverage technology so workers could scan themselves in, then train the admin to review for anomalies.
You're both right because you're talking about completely different things.
No, we must return to the traditional system: old-timey mechanical punch card systems - literally punch in, punch out.
I have this wonderful image of people working at a software company being forced, for some stupid reason, to use an actual mechanical punchclock system.
I wouldn't call it good for productivity but it can be useful but regime propaganda greatly overstates how useful it is.
They are acting like you are getting an entire workshop but it is closer to get a tool kit you give to a high schooler.
It is inherently flawed due to the tech relying on statistical predictions so it can't tell wrong from right.
Which makes useless unless you already know the right answer.
So much the productivity gains are just compensating for lack of basic tech literacy.
E.g. people sending event/meeting details without a calendar invite/ics file, so you run it through an LLM to generate you one.
I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of them clicked the wrong thing. Or couldn't read in the first place.