this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
886 points (98.7% liked)

politics

25773 readers
4138 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

There are two ways this can go

  1. AOC is sabotaged in the primary like Bernie, she loses
  2. AOC somehow wins the primary, shes than sabotaged by her own party during the general election and loses.
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 days ago (2 children)

she looses

Looses the dogs of war?

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Honestly why can’t mofos on the Internet spell ‘loses’ correctly?….

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

I don't know, but it's annoying.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Same reason why they keep mixing up you're and your; or there, their, and there. It's simple stuff, but maybe they're non-native speakers (or probably just dumb).

[–] topherclay@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The spelling of "lose/loose" is the exception to the common rule that words like "chose/choose" follow.

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

what? what words like chose/choose? i struggle to think of any word similar to chose/choose/chosen. chose isnt the same tense as lose. also, choice vs loss. theyre very different.

[–] topherclay@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Just in pronunciation. Usually when you put the two O's next to each other is affects the pronunciation of the O sound, as it does in chose/choose.

But for some reason the double O in lose/loose does not change the pronunciation of the vowel at all. It instead affects the pronunciation of the S to sound either like an "unvoiced S sound" or a "voiced Z sound."

If I told you to pronounce "Loo" then we would all agree on what that would sound like, but if I told you to add a Z sound to the end of that "Loo" then you might say "hey you spelled lose wrong, it only has one O."

That's the exception to the rule that I was talking about. O sounds and OO sounds are pretty straightforward but they don't work the way you would expect in the words "lose/loose".

I don't know if my explanation makes any sense if you don't already understand what I'm talking about, but this is the reason so many people on the internet misspell the word "lose".

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

i just don't know of anything besides choose that would follow that rule. i mean, theres noose. just legitimately cant think of some other examples of a word that is more like choose than lose

[–] topherclay@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

And my Lemmy app won't let me edit my typos so it's gonna be even harder to follow lol.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

Because English orthography makes no sense.

[–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

EVERYONE STOP TALKING! They also forgot an apostrophe. Gotta love prescriptivists.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It highlights lack of care, thought, or capability, thus reducing the impact of the overall message. It matters.

[–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yes, it's a casual comment, a casual thought written casually. All of your assumptions here don't apply. Why not spend time having a conversation rather than bringing it to a screeching halt enforcing made up rules? The only time I think criticizing grammar is warranted is if you're genuinely confused about what they're trying to say, and you can definitely be more polite when doing it.

Because they're Liberals, why would they hold a genuine conversation with a Leftist when they can just insult me and move on. They know im right as they very often do and they have no real counterpoint, when I dont have a typing mistake to make fun of they just call me a tankie or a Russian bot for not bowing to the party.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

So you'd rather police grammar than provide something to the conversation?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's not what prescriptivism is, unless your definition of prescriptivism is "knowing basic spelling rules"

[–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Is that not how language actually works? How is telling people to follow made up rules not prescriptivism?

[–] coffee_nutcase207@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

The billionaires would probably run a liberal coded centrist in the general just to take votes form her.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 points 4 days ago

There are many other parties they can join that won't boycott them, if they stay there it's because they are fine with it.