this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
184 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
40344 readers
213 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They have thousands of employees who discuss and make decisions before anything changes. Everything Meta does is intentional.
I’m going to assume this is Meta’s usual level of negligent greed, and there’s a decent chance that no human was involved. YouTube actually did something very similar.
Some fraction of the harm they do is by carelessness rather than malice. That some mindless algorithm designed to find and exploit for advertising purposes the posts that got the most engagement disproportionately selected ones featuring images of cute teenagers does not seem unlikely even if it wasn't aimed specifically at middle-aged parents..
They've intentionally maliciously set up systems where "carelessness" leads to these malicious outcomes.
It's not fail safe, nor fail secure. It's fail evil.
I don't think we can apply Hanlon to anything Meta does.
They have been doing it long enough to know that happens.