this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
460 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

16827 readers
3923 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Aren't the milky way and andromeda on a collision course with each other?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 11 points 3 days ago

Yep. Space is expanding everywhere at once, but the effect is minuscule at the scales we're used to. And even at galactic scales the "speed" of expansion might seem like a lot to us, but it still isn't enough to overcome the motion of objects. I looked up some rough numbers to give you an idea:

The rate of expansion of space is 73 km/s/Mpc. So for every 3.26 million light-years between you and a distant galaxy, the space between you and that galaxy is expanding by 73 kilometers per second.

Andromeda's blue shift indicates it's headed towards us at 110 km/s. And in my non-expert head I'm thinking that blueshifted light must have already been redshifted by the millions of years traveling through space to reach us. So the galaxy's speed through space towards us when the light was emitted was considerably higher.

Andromeda is 2.5 Million light-years away, btw. So the cumulative distance of space between here and there is expanding at something like 73 km/s/Mpc * 2.5 Mly * 1Mpc/3.26Mly = 57 km/s.

But when talking about relativistic distances and speeds, basic terms regarding time and location don't always make sense.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Milky way and Andromeda are close enough that expansion is too small to overpower gravity

Our local group is racing toward The Great Attractor but will never reach it as expansion is pulling it away faster than we're falling toward it

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but not because of universal expansion really, they're just headed in a direction that is going to intersect at some point, likely combining the two galaxies together. This'll be so far in the future we'll all be long dead though, on top of it being unlikely that anything is going to even come close to our solar system

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's the other part I find fascinating; these two galaxies are gonna intersect, but our solar system probably won't hit anything. That's so gnar.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

It's not just that, but it is unlikely that any star in our galaxy will collide with any star in Andromeda.

I think it's easy to think of galaxies as individual things, like these nodes in the universe where all the stuff is stored. But galaxies are incredibly vast and incredibly empty.

I love the video this guy did on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsRmyY3Db1Y

The part that stuck with me is that if you made the Milky Way the size of the United States, our gigantic sun holding 99.86% of the matter in the solar system would be microscopic -- the size of a red blood cell. And iirc, the planet earth would be all the way down to the size of a virus.