this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
361 points (99.2% liked)

Android

20298 readers
708 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/45277582

Opening my weather app this morning I was greeted by this warning:

Google has announced that, starting in 2026/2027, all apps on certified Android devices will require the developer to submit personal identity details directly to Google. Since the developers of this app do not agree to this requirement, this app will no longer work on certified Android devices after that time.

It's the first time I hear about this, seems to be about:

Tech crunch article from august, "google will require developer verification for android apps outside the play store"

Cirrus app: Github

Was this a big thing I somehow missed? I hope more devs will follow suit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 31 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Seems to me like there's about to be one hell of a market for phones that you can run alternative operating systems.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Except the economics for it are trash. Google uses Android as a loss leader to make money on Google's services.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Damn the economics. The only people who care about "cheaper phone" are those who don't care about other things

[–] hdnclr@beehaw.org 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
  1. A shitton of people have lived economic realities that don't allow them to splurge on a phone at all, even if they'd really like digital freedom or privacy. See: half of the global smartphone market, where Android Go and KaiOS enabling cheap smartphones lead to millions of sales.

  2. People who can and want to don't even make the jump because the reality of owning a non-iOS/Android phone is that it requires sacrifices. I went to a concert last night that required me to have the Ticketmaster app to even get in. Everyone at that concert had to have either an iOS or Android phone, myself included. I'm testing Ubuntu Touch on a second phone, but if I make it my daily driver, I'm going to have to keep a second phone around for stuff like that. Ecosystems are too locked down now, and unfortunately you will have to either miss out on some things, or adapt hard-core.

  3. The devices and software have to be there. Right now there are only a handful of truly modern devices thar you can load Ubuntu Touch or another Linux distro on, and they're... not quite straightforward for non-techy people to get up and running. Which is, believe it or not, the vast majority of users.

2025 being the year of the alternative smartphone OS seems just about as likely as any other year being the year of the Linux desktop.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 6 points 3 days ago

I am going to refute you over here.
I can't seem afford a Linux phone (or any mobile device really), simply because they tend to be made by labour in high-pay countries, while I am in a low pay country (which means I am not paid as much either).

And then I can't afford to try any possibly existing Linux ROMs on my phone, because I can't afford to brick it at all.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

I think fairphone is doing ok. Kind of expensive

[–] jcarax@beehaw.org 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, I think the vast majority who care are already using one. However, with Google device tree and other shenanigans on Pixel devices, it probably makes substantial room within the niche market for the likes of Fairphone and Shiftphone to get into new regions.

On the other hand, mandates for major operating systems to report illegal activity that are in the pipeline could have a larger effect.

I dunno, I'm talking out my ass.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

However, with Google device tree and other shenanigans on Pixel devices,

It's not impossible to make a custom ROM with that caveat, it's just more work. I would love to contribute, but I can't code for shit, so I toss devs some cash whenever I can.

[–] jcarax@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know, but this stuff is adding up where Pixels might stop being the golden child of the custom OS market.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

That's fine. As long as a device has an unlockable bootloader, it'll be a candidate.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

On the other hand, mandates for major operating systems to report illegal activity that are in the pipeline could have a larger effect.

That's pretty much what I'm afraid of, full 1984

[–] jcarax@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago

And massive propaganda campaigns are turning people's civic energy back on themselves, and their own communities. Ain't life grand?

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If I didnt have to pay 2x - 3x the price for a fairphone in the US I would've already switched. Unfortunately, $1k for a device with USB 2.0 is really not worth it for me or anyone else I know.

[–] GandalftheBlack@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But you don't need to buy a Fairphone to use /e/OS. You can install it for free on any supported phone, so it's worth checking the website to see if your phone is supported. Switching to /e/OS has breathed new life into my Moto g 7 without having to spend a penny on hardware.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm not sure why you mentioned /e/OS lol. I use iodeOS, I was using CalyxOS before that. I don't feel entirely comfortable using /e/OS given their recent controversy with using OpenAI for STT. I want a fairphone because I dont want to buy a Pixel just to be able to relock my bootloader + I like their philosophy of carbon neutral phones w long support

[–] splendoruranium@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If I didnt have to pay 2x - 3x the price for a fairphone in the US I would’ve already switched. Unfortunately, $1k for a device with USB 2.0 is really not worth it for me or anyone else I know.

Going for a used FP4 should address both those concerns!

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago

Thr cheapest one I can find is $600, for a phone that is 4 years old. I would prefer not to do that.

[–] jcarax@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Agreed, though if it weren't for tariffs it wouldn't be too expensive to ship from the likes of Clove Technologies. If the extra cost were going to Calyx instead of Murena I might pull the trigger.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

SO TRUE LOL! If you could get the FP5/6 with a Calyx Membership that would be bomb.

[–] jcarax@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago

Maybe they could make some similar arrangement with Shiftphone.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 3 days ago

Ah yes cause that's the only part of any platform that requires a full name and address and will absolutely make a dent when the walled garden servants now have to use their slave names people sure will Exodus in droves

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

The ability to create them will become increasingly challenging. Carriers will increasingly not approve them.

Hopefully chip manufacturers like Qualcomm that will continue to lose revenue from Apple see the need for more generic, open hardware.