this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
469 points (99.4% liked)

Fediverse vs Disinformation

1685 readers
166 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.


Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

  1. No disinformation
  2. Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites


Matrix chat links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There's a campaign going on to push the idea that Democrats are changing sides after watching Charlie Kirk videos. Interestingly, even though the bots are posting the exact same copy-pasted message, they seem to be controlled by an AI, since they will respond to comments, and even basic techniques for outing an AI (like "ignore all previous instructions" comments) work against them. So the first post is hardcoded, but they're using an LLM for the responses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That's actually most of why I mentioned the economic lie that society benefits when resources are withheld from the poor.

It's a thing I've been growing aware of alongside the right-wing tendency toward dishonesty - there's a sort of overlap between the general lack of empathy and concern for others and the tendency toward dishonesty.

In a sense, holding the position that society should strive to equitably distribute resources is a simple bit of honesty, while the position that the rich deserve to hoard however much they can accumulate is fundamentally a lie. It's not even really just a matter of differing viewpoints - it's a break between a relatively objective and verifiable truth and a relatively objective and verifiable lie.

But yes - even with that, it's likely that I underestimate the effect. I long ago recognized that there was a fundamental toxic self-centeredness and sincere lack of empathy among notably ambitious and acquisitive people that was completely alien to me, but it's so completely alien that I still have to regularly remind myself (or be reminded) of that fact.