this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
829 points (98.7% liked)

Facepalm

3399 readers
56 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You could probably call the first one a tragic accident that is ultimately the doctor's fault, but he's killed at a minimum four people by the end.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Ok, but to be fair, how many of us haven't killed at least four people.

[–] Lobster@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You could....

Frankenstein! you belong then to my enemy—to him towards whom I have sworn eternal revenge; you shall be my first victim.’

The child still struggled and loaded me with epithets which carried despair to my heart; I grasped his throat to silence him, and in a moment he lay dead at my feet.

I gazed on my victim, and my heart swelled with exultation and hellish triumph; clapping my hands, I exclaimed, ‘I too can create desolation; my enemy is not invulnerable; this death will carry despair to him, and a thousand other miseries shall torment and destroy him

...but I didn't read it that as an accident. Imagine using that defense in a courtroom: "I wasn't trying to kill the child, I was trying to kidnap him for revenge. I killed him by accident when choking him to silence him." Especially given the physical mismatch of a huge heavyweight versus a tiny child.

As I said earlier, "I think the problem is the students are giving too much credence to the monster’s monologues"