this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
461 points (99.6% liked)

Android

31994 readers
177 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] pivot_root@lemmy.world 62 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

How would this impact F-Droid in any way?

F-Droid itself builds the APKs to ensure that they're reproducible and not signed on a development machine that could be compromised.

https://f-droid.org/en/docs/FAQ_-_General/#is-your-building-and-signing-process-secure

With these changes, either:

  • They use Google's developer identity process to sign every APK they build with their own developer identity, which Google is likely not going to allow or is going to quickly find an example of a "malicious" app so they can blacklist all of them; or
  • They stop building APKs and just trust the developer provides a non-malicious, pre-verified APK;
  • They find a way to mediate the process between the original developer and Google. Knowing Google, they would make it as needlessly painful for everyone involved to discourage and punish alternative app stores.
[โ€“] MudMan@fedia.io 13 points 4 days ago

Oooh, gotcha. That makes sense.

I guess it'd make sense to take that first option as far as it will go, at which point the issue becomes litigating this the first time Google has their own weird censorship issue in the Apple mold. I'd expect if they ban all of F-Droid explicitly that would at least make more ripples than going after a single torrent client app or whatever. It may play out different from a regulatory perspective, too, if the practical effect is they ban third party stores.

Side note, I'm really mad at the very deliberate choice Google made of categorizing all potential apps as either "apps meant for Google Play" or "student or hobbyist apps". You know they know why that's wrong, but it still makes you want to explain it to them.