this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
832 points (98.7% liked)

Facepalm

3400 readers
12 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Simply saying “The creature was a victim” lacks any kind of nuance regarding the rest of the book. Yes, the creature was a victim. Then it became a monster, because it had always been treated as if it was one.

That sounds more nuanced, but is still a really bad take. A better take on this is the film "Monster" about Aileen Wuornos. If life never gives you a chance, you can be violent, yet still a victim.