this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
573 points (99.5% liked)

World News

50090 readers
2228 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Australian beef has replaced U.S. supply in China since Donald Trump returned to the White House, funnelling hundreds of millions of dollars that have in previous years gone to the U.S. cattle industry into Australian pockets.

U.S. shipments to China, worth around $120 million a month, collapsed after Beijing in March allowed permits to expire at hundreds of American meat facilities and as Trump unleashed a tit-for-tat tariff war.

Other U.S. farm exports to China, the world's biggest food importer, have also suffered since Trump retook power. On soybeans alone, U.S. farmers have lost out on shipments worth billions of dollars during the current harvest season.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

i mean i used to belong to a cult where they believed and very quietly taught that democrats and liberals are worse than the devil. there's reasons upon reasons someone might vote against their apparent self-interest and be behaving in a perceivably irrational manner, that's just the first that comes to mind. the social effects of being one of two open democrats in a deep red county are far beyond unpleasant. they might value their immediate social standing (even though they never have to tell anyone how they vote) more than the business they could have had were the US tariff/trade waffling bullshit not drastically reducing the markets they have available for sales.

i guess my point is what appears to be irrational behavior to an observer usually has a rational basis if you understand the person's motivations and preferences

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Irrational reasons do not make rational decisions. They Irrationally voted against themselves. Even if they believe otherwise deep, deep in the core of their souls. Logic does not care. They actively demonize logic. Why would you try and defend them with it?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Irrational decisions are only irrational to people who misunderstand the decider's reasoning. The things you value more, they value less. Your value assessment is by definition wrong for everyone besides yourself. People don't vote solely based on how they expect to be affected financially, even though that's really the only assessment you can make that doesn't fail immediately due to the quantification problem. Since people typically vote based on unquantifiables, why do you assume that your valuation of said unquantifiables is correct for everyone?