this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
73 points (98.7% liked)

news

161 readers
632 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

So when a grand jury issues an indictment, the prosecutor has two choices:

  • ask for an arrest warrant. The indictment remains secret until the arrest has been completed, and the defendant appears in court.
  • ask for a summons. The indictment is made public and the papers are served on the defendant like a regular lawsuit.

In this case, they went with option 2, summons. Which is the normal option for just perjury with no imminent flight risk.

And I hope to God that we still live in a country where they can't just go back to arrest the guy without first going back to the judge to get a warrant.