this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)
news
158 readers
570 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
i don't see how this would instill terror in the government and make them change some policy. (change what btw. fireproof mosqes?)
i don't even see this terrorising a voter group big enough to influence the government indirectly.
but i acknowledge that terrorists usually aren't very bright, so if they are terrorists, they maybe believe it works like that.
Terrorism acts rarely made a government bend to their demands or policies changes. It doesn't have to successful to be an terrorist act
If terrorists was not bright in a certain aspect they would never succeed in accomplish any attacks
nah, terrorism is one of the easiest stupidest things, because it's impossible to protect against. every idiot can start a fire or blow himself up. and even then, some terrorists fail, meaning they are the stupidest of the stupid.
Not all terrorist attack are simple as start a fire or blowing up
but they can be. adding extra points of failure through complexity is even more stupid