this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
626 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25961 readers
2560 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The home of South Carolina Circuit Court judge Diane Goodstein was set on fire after she had reportedly received death threats.

State law enforcement is investigating the house fire on Edisto Beach which began at around 11:30 a.m. E.T. on Saturday, sources told local news outlet FITSNews.

Goodstein was reportedly not at home at the time of the fire, but at least three members of her family, including her husband, former Democratic state senator Arnold Goodstein, and their son, have been hospitalized with serious injuries. According to the St. Paul’s Fire District, which responded to the scene, the occupants had to be rescued via kayak. Law enforcement have not disclosed whether the fire is being investigated as an arson attack.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Texas is sending their troops (National Guard) to Oregon to fight people in Portland.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Well I agree that is a bad move; it's authoritarian, violent, expensive, unnecessary, and most likely unconstitutional.

But does sending National Guard troops to another state constitute a civil war?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They are military forces from one state being sent to another, and the target state did not ask for it.

Does the US deploying "peacekeeping" troops to an African nation constitute war? The people of Somalia who participated in the Battle of Mogadishu would probably think so.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

So it was a civil war when National Guard troops were deployed in an attempt to quell the George Floyd uprising?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The governor of MN invited them there, so no.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

"invited" is questionable, I know my governor was pressured and put under duress in order to accept Trump's national guard deployment during George Floyd.

But what about a clearer example: President Eisenhower deployed National Guard troops to Arkansas to enforce the desegregation of schools. The national guard was explicitly not invited by the Governor of Arkansas. Was this a civil war?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

That was Arkansas' own National Guard, and the Mayor of Little Rock had actually asked for it to happen. The school district itself was also supportive. So no.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Oregon National Guard, State Police, and all county sheriff's along the Oregon border should place roadblocks, and refuse entry to their state by any out-of-state armed military or law enforcement entity.

California should also close off their roadways to Oregon. Make them come in from Idaho or Nevada.

If you want in so bad, try to shoot your way in. See how well that works out for you.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The truth is the voters in states like Oregon don't actually have command of their own police forces. The police don't answer to elected politicians. They're an independent occupying force that answers only to themselves. And they support the regime.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The governors can't arrest sherrifs? Mayors cant fire chiefs of police? Officers don't follow orders?

[–] Bocky@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Correction, trump is trying to take the Texas troops. Texas is not involved in this dispute.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 day ago

"I fully authorized the President to call up 400 members of the Texas National Guard to ensure safety for federal officials"

That's Texas Gov Abbott giving the rubber stamp to do it. The government of Texas is completely on board with this.