this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
994 points (98.7% liked)

Funny

11848 readers
2306 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mostly_Roblox@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Windows peaked at 7, I only moved to Windows 10 when Windows 7 lost support

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Windows peaked at DOS. It was small, inoffensive, and easily killed.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's mostly due to your age. Older people say it peaked at XP, younger people are saying it peaked at 10. Truth is, they're all kinda the same shit.

[–] Logical@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Is it though? From a privacy perspective I think Windows 10 quite clearly started introducing some shady surveillance practices which were absent in earlier versions. Of course, 11 took that waaay further, but 10 was a turning point imo.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's a hard case to make that 7 wasn't objectively better than XP.

Windows 10 did roll back some of the more egregious stuff from Windows 8, but still was sort of committed, sort of not. You had a platform with multiple personalities, multiple right click context menus, multiple 'control panel' with a new one being emphasized, but not actually completed, so it's an awkward mix of the platform they had suceeded with and a platform they wished it could be (combined with telemetry). Forced microsoft accounts and using the desktop as a platform to promote products and services....

Yeah I think a fair argument can be made that WIndows 7 was the ultimate execution of the general vision that started with Windows NT, and what came after was something else that also happened to have bits of that original product hanging on.

I'm not too terribly excited by any Windows in particular, but I can recognize something categorically different they wanted to do starting with 8 that remains partially executed to this day, starts to emphasize Microsoft's interests at the expense of the users, and a direction that no one really asked for.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 1 points 19 hours ago

Exactly this. 7 was absolutely the peak of Windows. Everything after was enshittification, and everything prior was still less user-friendly and rough around the edges.

And anyone arguing XP was peak should try installing XP and try connecting to wifi. Talk about a mess. XP was only a marginal upgrade over 98/2000, but with some glossy paint. 7 was the first time Windows felt modern.

[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

95, 98, xp, and 7 were all great; each improved on the last. But 7 was the true peak. 10 was pretty good and unfortunately was the turning point into enshitification.

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.org 1 points 20 hours ago

95/98 was another operating system, though. Windows ~~98~~ ME (forgot about that one) was the last OS in the original Windows series– that Windows that was basically just a graphic shell for DOS.

IIRC, XP was the 5^th^ version of Microsoft's fork of OS/2. OS/2 was rebranded as Microsoft NT in its 3^rd version due to the success of the brand Windows and the failure of OS/2 despite OS/2 having been the superior OS.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do not make me find the pic of The Dude.

[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I might be slowly turning into Jeff Bridges.

Edit: missed the joke. My opinions about windows are grounded in my own experience, obviously. I'm the 'wait for the first SP' person historically. 10 was the first time I was not excited to install a new operating system. Everything was behind shitty UI that took away simple functionality. Funny enough I'd go back to it over 11 lol.

[–] cm0002@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Oh how I wish we could just go back to W7 :(

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

I agree. This is why I think literally all software should be FLOSS. People should be able to use a platform as long as they like on their own hardware.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a programmer, my world changed when Windows 95 came out, what with being 32-bit and having an extremely powerful (if difficult-to-use at first) low-level audio API, since I mainly wrote software synthesis and music composition apps. I have not given two fucks for anything that has happened since 95. Quite amazingly, that audio API has remained in existence, unchanged, all the way until today. 30 years of not having to change what I'm doing at all has been absolutely amazing. That shit even worked, without modification, for Windows CE (Compact Edition) and Windows Mobile, so I was able to make versions of my software synthesizer that ran on shitty smartphones from 2005. It worked on Windows Phone as well, albeit it quite uselessly.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

That is super interesting! I could read your comments on the windows audio API all day! Do you have a development blog? I’d also love to read more about this audio API.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

In a way you can. Install ZorinOS or Linux Mint. Add WINE, and you can set wine to "emulate" an version of Windows. I was using it to run some old engineering program and WinAmp

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

I've got Windows installed on a separate drive in case I wanna play Forza Horizon 5 (which I stupidly bought on Microsoft store because stepdad had an Xbox at the time and it was nice to be able to play on that as well when I was visiting - now even he moved to PS5). I haven't booted it in over half a year despite missing the game at times. If it was Windows 7, I'd probably boot every now and then.

At this point I've forgotten if I have Windows 10 or 11. Chances are I did some enterprise version of one of them to get longer support, as I did the OS install like 8 or 9 months ago.

[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

Nah, best (or more accurately: least crappy) Windows version was Windows 2000. Everything got bloated and too consumery after that.