this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
37 points (100.0% liked)

news

155 readers
1343 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I don't I agree that the point stands

If an elevator is rated for 1500lbs and fails with 1000lbs of people on it, I'm not absolving the operators and maintainers and somehow blaming the 7 people on the elevator for not magically knowing the "true" safe limit was 6.

If he was too large for the equipment, the company shouldn't have made the attempt. It was thier fault.

If he was not too large and the equipment failed due to improper usage or maintenance, it again was the company's fault.

If he was not too large and the equipment was properly operated and maintained, it was the fault of the manufacturer.

There are a great many ways that people (overweight or not) can be ultimately responsible for thier own deaths. This is not one of those cases. I believe it is dismissive and callous to jump to the conclusion that it was.