this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
226 points (97.5% liked)

World News

50244 readers
1918 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As usual, here are my (extremely) unpopular opinions: 1: This ban is made to extend to smartphones for children overall, allowing some abuse situations to be carried out without risk. Furthermore, this might (later) extend to some workers, women overall, then lower “castes” and classes. 2: This is another way for Chat Control to also be implemented later, by setting the roots for such.

Oh, another thing: using age as a metric is darn stupid — aren't some of the worst leaders actually quite… elderly?

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think its simpler than that, its not about banning children its about identifying everyone else

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

It is about both. If you can control the information and communication capabilities children get, you can do whatever with them.

[–] tym@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

100% on your last point. We need IQ and EQ tests to decide who gets access to sharp social objects.