this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
29 points (91.4% liked)
RetroGaming
25295 readers
183 users here now
Vintage gaming community.
Rules:
- Be kind.
- No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Latency is not 0 like op suggests but he's not entirely wrong about the latency comparison to modern displays (at a technical level for your average modern display). You are still correct that the numbers are so low typically that it's not an issue for... 99.9% of people. Probably more, we might want to add a lot more 9s to the end.
If we're talking to someone like a top competitive street fighter player though, I'm super interested in how they feel about CRTs vs modern displays. Note that this is also a different conversation if you're on a TV that doesn't have some sort of a Game Mode, those can be rough.
Great writeup on real world CRT input lag: https://www.resetera.com/threads/crts-have-8-3ms-of-input-lag-addressing-a-common-misconception-about-display-latency.40628/
Yeah I think a good gaming monitor has better latency than a CRT. I remember a Mario 64 speedrunning event brought the top players in for a weekend (literally a new world record was set at this event, they had all the best players) and they were all playing on gaming monitors with a good N64 to HDMI adapter. None of them complained about latency, they all enjoyed the setup, and I remember the world record holder (Cheese) actually started using the same setup at home.
The top Mario 1 player (Niftski) plays on a computer with a gaming monitor.