this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
122 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck AI

4292 readers
1633 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
122
submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by Zachariah@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
 

I knew I wasn’t interested in A.I. for a while now, but I think I can finally put it into words.

A.I. is supposed to be useful for things I’m not skilled at or knowledgeable about. But since I’m not skilled at or knowledgeable about the thing I’m having A.I. do for me, I have no way of knowing how well A.I. accomplished it for me.

If I want to know that, I have to become skilled at or knowledgeable about the thing I need to do. At this point, why would I have A.I. do it since I know I can trust I’m doing it right?

I don’t have a problem delegating hiring people who are more skilled at or more knowledgeable about something than me because I can hold them accountable if they are faking.

With A.I., it’s on me if I’m duped. What’s the use in that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alternategait@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe not letters to your grandma, but to send out 1000 “your benefits have changed” in 600 subtly different ways.

[–] HetareKing@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

I would argue that's actually the last situation you'd want to use an LLM. With numbers like that, nobody's going to review each and every letter with the attention things generated by an untrustworthy agent ought to get. This sounds to me like it calls for a template. Actually, it would be pretty disturbing to hear that letters like that aren't being generated using a template and based on changes in the system.