this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
104 points (94.1% liked)

worldnews

2887 readers
110 users here now

Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.

/c/Worldnews@sh.itjust.works strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.

These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!



Rules:


Disallowed submissions

Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:

Thank you.

todo list:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/37367499

This is building consent for a US war on Venezuela.

Nobel war prize more like, considering the people they award this to.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I never made that claim, you did. I can't prove a claim you made up. Please go back and try reading.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

" Doomsider @lemmy.world English Are you seriously suggesting that Noble Peace awards are beyond influence and corruption"

Literally your claim. Do you have proof of this?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And I gave an example of a corrupt pick. Obama.

So I never said the US forced them to pick anyone only that they are not above influence.

Are you done making up strawmen now?

The amount of dishonesty you display is staggering.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

No you offered up a strawman with Obama as he was not picked by the USA nor have you provided evidence that Obama’s selection was influenced by the USA. You argued against his selection to “win” which is what a strawman argument is.

You offered no proof of influence or corruption only a straw-man claim.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Lol, I am done playing logical fallacies with you. You just keep saying things I never said acting like a buffoon. Have fun arguing with yourself. Cheers!