this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
376 points (97.5% liked)

Funny

12000 readers
1746 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Thank god I got traumatized. If I would’ve seen the movie as an adult, I would have hated it.

It was so weird. People liked i that movie enough to go and start making crop circles in the cornfields outside town.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's not a good movie. I did enjoy the mystery of it though, it does build up nicely until the big reveal of what they look like.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This describes most of his movies. Good build up to the mystery with a payoff so bad it retroactively makes everything before it worse.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wait, I never thought about that and this is probably the best and most accurate description of how his movies are.

I recently saw Glass for the very first time. Rewatched Unbreakable and Split just to refresh the memory. And I was happy with Glass until I was halfway through. Afterwards, everything was just set on fire and I was left with nothing.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah, the Shamalayan "twist" is that halfway through every flick, the creative flow becomes an untethered spray. Picture, if you will, a olde-timey grinder producing a length of sausage when suddenly, the casing comes loose... so the crank doubles its speed. How M. Night's movies get made. 😶 (If you look closely, stamped into the steel there is the ShamaWurst logo.)