this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
234 points (81.5% liked)

Progressive Politics

3387 readers
166 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

To say "we have trump because of you"... trump is trying to create an apocalypse on earth and kamala is the villain.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What’s your issue? Nothing about the statement is inaccurate. Though it is missing a lot of context, such as it was Clinton who ordered the pied piper strategy to elevate Trump to the nomination, so she shares a lot of the blame.

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub -4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I don't think we're going to get someone to the left of Kamala for the next few presidents. All the protest voters helped our country choose hard mode, and a lot of them are trying to rationalize it in any way that doesn't make them feel like they played a part in such a close election.

We have Trump because more people voted for Trump, and lots of people didn't vote at all. You could blame Biden or Kamala, sure, but the entire political party could also be blamed, along with the establishment itself. Was Kamala the best candidate to run? Probably not. Biden decided to try for another term, though, and we ended up where we are.

When you can choose between the lesser of 2 evils, or not choose at all: be aware of what "not choosing" will actually do.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think we’re going to get someone to the left of Kamala for the next few presidents.

Then you're not going to win any elections for the next few presidents

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago

Your comment is exactly why Hillary and Harris lost. Even now, you can't see that the compromise candidate will eventually fail, and continue to fail, because their values don't match the voters.

And hey, if you had written this comment before 2016, or even before 2024, we could understand your instinct. You might not have realized how the Dems' shift to the right would undercut the entire party. But now you should be able to figure it out. Take Harris's policies, for example. Which ones were going to benefit the average American? She was weak on Israel, her border strategy was xenophobic (and therefore racist), her home owner tax credit would not have lowered housing or rent prices for the vast majority of Americans... In other words, even if she got everything she wanted, would it have made our lives better? I just don't see it, and neither did hundreds of millions of Americans.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

by "protest voters" you mean the ones that voted Kamala specifically to protest Trump?

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

All it would take to be left of Harris is opposing genocide and unlawful deportations.

The problem is that you Blue MAGAs support fascism, too, but you believe yourselves better than the Red MAGAs because you like fascists with a commitment to decorum. And you project that onto the rest of us, so you think our rejection of these Democrats is simply a rejection of decorum. Just like the Red MAGAs, you cannot even conceive of any “good American” rejecting your party’s fascism. And probably, just like them, you don’t actually pay attention to the policies you’re really supporting. You just treat it like team sports.

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

We should never stop holding leaders responsible for their actions.