-4
submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

yeah let's look at some actual numbers shall we

Professor of Economic History, Robert C. Allen, concludes in his study without the 1917 revolution is directly responsible for rapid growth that made the achievements listed above possilbe:

Study demonstrating the steady increase in quality of life during the Soviet period (including under Stalin). Includes the fact that Soviet life expectancy grew faster than any other nation recorded at the time:

A large study using world bank data analyzing the quality of life in Capitalist vs Socialist countries and finds overwhelmingly at similar levels of development with socialism bringing better quality of life:

This study compared capitalist and socialist countries in measures of the physical quality of life (PQL), taking into account the level of economic development.

This study shows that unprecedented mortality crisis struck Eastern Europe during the 1990s, causing around 7 million excess deaths. The first quantitative analysis of the association between deindustrialization and mortality in Eastern Europe.

Meanwhile, hilarious for you to mention Cuba and DPRK given that your shithole excuse for a country has done everything possible to choke their trade with the world. Good thing that SWIFT is going the way of the dodo now.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol, you're claiming one measure in physical quality of life means communism is great. Ignoring the fact that all of those countries have now either failed or have moved to a market based system in order to improve life.

Hilarious

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, pretty hilarious that once these countries abandoned communism and switched to capitalism quality of life rapidly deteriorated. Thanks for underscoring my point.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Not according to actual data from the last 30 years, but you don't actually accept facts so discussing anything with anyone as deluded as you is pointless

Why do you think 19th century ideology is relevant in the 21st?

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Yes, according to actual data from the last 30 years. And of course, we can just see what the people who lived under both systems have to say:

And it's the height of ignorance to think that communism is a 19th century ideology that hasn't been successfully evolving for over a century. I knew that UK education system was bad, but holy shit that's embarrassing.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Polls are not economic data

Here you go, Hungary versus the only mildly successful communist country in history, Vietnam

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=HU-VN

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, Vietnam that US empire razed to the ground. Very intelligent comparison from a very intelligent person. Why don't we compare with another communist country called China?

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
-4 points (0.0% liked)

World News

32318 readers
1029 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS