661
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
661 points (98.0% liked)
Technology
34907 readers
250 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
"NO U" would only apply if I was doing what you were doing. I was not.
Your rails were going nowhere but through a circus. Of course I'm going to point and laugh at clowns.
The topic of this fucking thread was, quote, "Internet developments have gone from exciting to dreadful." And you brought your techbro hustlegrind clown circus. So you derailed the thread in this comment chain, clown. And now I'm pointing and laughing at the clown.
Where did I make that request in this thread? Not everyone in the world is a Patrick Bateman LARPer like yourself.
And I suggested you lay off on the techbro hustlegrind shit if you want me to stop laughing at the clown.
I'm laughing at the clown, so yes I'm handling it.
What's the hustle? When I say that OP should try for himself or when I reply to your question, suggesting that the created things could become the reward?
Don't you believe that the fediverse will grow and that there are still many opportunities left?
I sincerely think highly enough of you that I'm certain you're just lying at this point. You've spent hours proselytizing about techbro innovation and even invoked your favorite billionaire pedophile as a patron saint of that innovation. That's a hustle, or to be more exact and less flattering, a grift.
Yes, that's a derailment that invalidated everything they said by adding even more steaming techbro bullshit to the pile they were already saying they were dreading.
That's a bad-faith loaded question that is attempting to associate any activity here with your particular brand of corporate bootlickery and billionaire worship.
Rereading the text, I see something else. He complains about negativity and corporations stifling small initiatives. Look what you are spreading about my comment that reaffirms small initiatives.
I hope that you can laugh about yourself, because I do, slightly.
Can't you stop being stuck at me mentioning BG? You made it clear that you don't care about profits but about abuse. Let's figure out something exciting.
You're seeing dollar signs and another profit vector to proselytize to. You missed the entire point because you forgot not everyone's part of your cult.
I'm too busy laughing at the hustlegrind techbro clown that keeps juggling bullshit while dodging every label possible.
No. Because you brought him up and categorically he's a monster, and not just the pedophilia parts. You're so slimy that you even found a sophistic way to excuse his lobbying maneuvers to keep covid vaccines sealed under private ownership, and that was after your pretentious lies about how he shares the cake or whatever.
Yes. I do care about abuse. Your billionaire saviors are abusing the planet and the life that still remains upon it and may well kill us all.
This isn't an office pizza party. Empty corpo bullshit like that is just calliope music to accompany your corpo clown act.
I didn't excuse the vaccine lobbying. You are stuck in your first judgment. If you want to nag me then it works because BG is no hero of mine.
You are right about me caring about profits though. Logistics is everything. How do you want to create something without a positive resource balance?
Still wondering, what's the entire point of OP's text? I guess you focus on the evil domination of evil corporations. How do you want to resolve it if not with small initiatives?
First judgement about a ghoulish corpo bootlicker that was singing the praises of a pedophile billionaire that looted the public education system of the United States, made sure more people died of covid by keep vaccines hoarded for profit, and practices eugenics and Mengele-adjacent medical experimentation on poor people in impoverished countries under pretenses of "philanthropy?" Fucking yes I will hold on to that judgement because you disgust me.
No shit.
You're one of those "everything is transactional" ghouls. That's clownish and bone chilling.
"I guess you focus on the house burning down instead of trying to peddle a new 'smart' refrigerator and dishwasher while the house is still burning down!"
By leaving the burning house, you tech cultist freak.
You keep insulting me because I mistook you as the very thing you hate the most, a profit seeking hustler. I still think asking about the other 99.9% is difficult to associate with the danger of oppression when the context is recreating the pluralistic internet. But now I know better.
You won't leave the house because, without tech, the majority of humans will starve to death.
As you wrote in another thread, you want to leave the police surveillance state. It's a bit late for that, isn't it?
Instead, you take solace in having put a hustle bro in his place while all you did was showing that small incentives are dangerous because people find a way to hate everything.
By leaving the house... Do you have a plan or are you hoping that things work out because things are not transactional and everything can happen?
I'm laughing at a clown.
That's very clownish of you, yes.
Yes, because your entire ideology not only fails them but kills them.
Good quotation skills. If only you would care as much as you pretend to do.
You're such a deeply invested cultist that you seem to believe "caring" means believing in your cult.
SAD!
Yes, that's you. Maga by spreading empty phrases. The billionaires will pay for dismantling the police state.
Read the room.
You've written hours of empty corporate slogans. No one seems to be interested in buying into it, which is fortunate because your ideology is burning the planet down.
They made the police state and profit from it, you ignorant creep.
Read the room. It's me who is upvoting you.
Nobody is following this track because it's rooted in a big misunderstanding that you are unwilling to let go. The other replies to my comment are far more interesting.
You are the ignorant creep if you think that that quote was my opinion. It's me putting your words in your mouth. But good to know that you recognize incoherence when you think it's coming from me.
"NO U" only works as a reply if I am doing any of the things that you are doing. I am not.
Get better material or get off the stage, corpo clown.
You used that before. Are you chatgpt? Being ignorant is not an action.
You're giving me nothing new to work with.
That said, it's pretty common for techbro cultists like yourself to dehumanize anyone they disagree with and pretend they lack consciousness.
There are plenty of open issues that you have chosen to ignore while you enjoyed dwelling in insults. I get the hang of it but let's not pretend that's me who is dehumanizing.
"What about the profitz" is the only one you care about and is not even on my radar.
Yes, because I continue laughing at the clown even if the clown's material could use some variety. I'd ask for balloon animals or some unicycle riding but you'd probably demand a subscription service with tracking software and a blockchain token.
Gaslighting language is par for the course for techbro creeps like yourself.
I call you a clown. You called me a chatbot program.
I would like to know how you want to resolve the surveillance state.
Putting me into that clichee of a tech bro as if I don't care about anything else, how is that not dehumanising?
If you want to leave the circus, stop juggling bullshit and find the Great Egress.
Prepare another NO U answer. That comment is bullshit unless the Great Egress has actual meaning. In that case, please elaborate. Otherwise try again. How do you want to resolve the surveillance state?
So that's it.
Here, you are willing to suggest death to resolve conflicts.
There is also this reference:
A Two hustlegrind comment chains comment where you, as I interpret it, reject competition as a tool to prevent market dominating rent seeking.
The upvotes reaffirm you.
From my perspective that's fundamentally wrong. You are either able to turn everybody into a friend and thus don't need conflicts, or you manage conflicts by distributing power.
If I don't see the light and you know how to turn the world into a better place, good luck for your approach.