this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
46 points (87.1% liked)

Formula 1

10400 readers
42 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


πŸ“† F1 Calendar
🏁 FIA Documents
πŸ“Š F1 Pace


2025 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ώ Azerbaijan 19-21 Sep
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ Singapore 03-05 Oct
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 17-19 Oct
πŸ‡²πŸ‡½ Mexico 24-26 Oct
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· Brazil 07-09 Nov
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 20-22 Nov
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 28-30 Nov
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 05-07 Dec

Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
  8. No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Too early to say, but it does seem that the new flexible parts rule clarification could have been aimed at their car

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Wasn't the Flexi stuff also the front wing/nose?

If you lack downforce then the amount of power you can put down in corners is also impacted, which you can address by changing the map with earlier upshifts.

Checo was complaining about lack of power at the start of the corner he had his spin that then came in late, like they were cutting power.

Otherwise it would be very odd to change the engine map unless they are worried about Ferrari style PU rule breaches and toned it down. They had enough pace to just put on new PUs, take the penalty and still win, so I don't buy the PU is at risk of going.