World News

37177 readers

689 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

101

submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tomten@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They gave the artist a bunch of money that was supposed to be used in the piece and was to be returned once done. It wasnt used nor returned.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah but the art piece he did produce was much better

[–] Lols@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

its a breach of contract regardless

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

It makes a statement.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I argue the money was used in the piece. The fact that it was missing from the canvas was part of the artistic statement.

[–] tomten@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Sure but it was supposed to be returned either way