1608
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dameoutlaw@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately and admittedly, we are the problem. These companies know that people pay for convenience and stick to what they know. If we were less likely to do so companies would have to raise their standards. Take Twitter for example, even with Musks over inflated numbers other sources indicate there's still hundreds of millions of Twitter users. They see all of the things Musk has done and it hasn't buried his business thus they are now taking pages out of his book.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Blaming individuals for not performing collective consumerist acts against corporations is liberal bullshit that only excuses corporate wrongdoing.

EDIT: To spare other people from having to read the smug corpo clown buffoonery beneath this post, I'll put the most relevant part I wanted to stress up here instead:

The eight hour day, the end of widescale child labor, the concept of minimum wage, and much more that improved the lot of the working class and of society as a whole were not the products of "vote with your wallet" nonsense. Slavery wasn't abolished in the United States (it still isnt if you count the prison system, and you should, but stay with me here) by cotton buyers coming together to only buy "ethical" cotton.

[-] dameoutlaw@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago

It’s not liberal bs. It’s lazy thinking on your part and people are agreeing with you to shuck accountability. None of the services are essential services. We could easily drop them and it have nearly zero material impact on our lives. Spare me the BS. Just say you’re too lazy to pull away from comfort. People vote with their dollars all of the time. It’s also not liberal, there’s been conservative stances against businesses and corporations as well. As humans some of the biggest influences we have in society is our votes and our dollars. Quit being lazy and just state you’re fine with things as long as it doesn’t disrupt your comforts. That’s better than calling it “liberal”

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s not liberal bs

It is.

It’s lazy thinking on your part

No, blaming individuals for not coming together in some magical way and putting all the responsibility on them for what corporations do is your lazy thinking. Next you'll say that blood diamonds are entirely the fault of people buying them and not the DeBeers corporation enforcing artificial scarcity with them while performing atrocities at the same time, with the implication that atrocities just happen until a magical moment that people stop buying the artificially scarce diamonds, and because that is materialistically highly unlikely in the present system, that just allows smuglords like you to shame the masses while at the same time feeling idealistically superior to them while doing nothing.

We

Stop saying "we." You are licking the boot and blaming the masses for not being as enlightened as you so you can feel superior to them.

Quit being lazy

Quit being a smug liberal bootlicker. smuglord farquaad-point

[-] dameoutlaw@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

It’s not liberal then what do you call conservatives that make the same decisions? You’re just weak. I love how you gloss over the protections of your comforts. It’s not lazy thinking to hold businesses and government accountable. How tf do you think we do that? People have protested, use their votes and used their dollars. YOU are the lazy one. I’m glad we live in a different world because people and those that agree with you would still have us in the slave days and civil rights wouldn’t be fought for at all. You do understand it was peoples protests, voting and their dollars that forced many of the major movements of the world right? Not people just waiting for businesses and governments to magically do the right thing. Having people ban together despite their comforts is not magical nor lazy. You are just weird.

[-] GreenTeaRedFlag@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Conservatives are liberals based upon the meaning of words. Do you know what liberalism is? It's not gay rights and lattes.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You've already showed your whole ass and at this point there's no meaningful way to continue replying to you. Continue tooting your self-aggrandizing horn of self-superiority and roll around on a unicycle like the corpo clown that you are. 🤡

For anyone else reading this far, remember this: the eight hour day, the end of widescale child labor, the concept of minimum wage, and much more were not the products of the "vote with your wallet" masses-blaming clownishness you see above this post. Slavery wasn't abolished in the United States (it still isnt if you count the prison system, and you should, but stay with me here) by cotton buyers coming together and only buying "ethical" cotton.

[-] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

I just think people shouldn't be chided for doing what is convenient when so much of our economy is attention based. Kind of like hating the players instead of the game.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 15 points 1 year ago

I have enough hate for both and more tyvm

[-] Rekliner@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed on convenience being enough for most people. Unity isn't going anywhere. They are priced above Unreal now but they have the market share to justify it. There are a million other game engines with newer approaches than "coke and pepsi" but they take more work and there's less community to pull from. There are just so many assets and abilities pre built in those game engines that allow a young developer to be productive. If you don't need all of that then you have a wide pick of frameworks to apply your code chops to. I'd love for Godot to become Dr Pepper but it's got a long way to go for even that slot. If unity had done this in a year or two from now it might be a different story but it takes a long time to reach a status like Blender, and even Blender isn't the go-to for industry professionals. I love LibreOffice but I've never worked at a company that is willing to tolerate those little rough edges.

Twitter is still the centralized place for a mainstream figure/organization to engage from. They have all researched mastodon and the like, opened accounts, and can't get the same engagement. It takes people more work to find their accounts in other places and most lay-users just aren't going to put in the effort. They're only in it for the lulz. This may reach a critical mass someday like with myspace but any alternative still needs a central point to funnel them to. Reddit doesn't benefit from centralization the same way and I think Lemmy/ap will scratch the itch for major topics, but it's still harder to grow smaller communities that aren't risa.

Blizzard has been being blizzard for years, that's not just a 2023 thing!

I wish it was different. We all hate nodding to authority. But there's a certain momentum that carries with popularity and they can surf that on their enshittification for years to come.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
1608 points (98.6% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1312 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS