249
submitted 1 year ago by Syldon@feddit.uk to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have read because it was a private road, they are legally not allowed to place an unmovable object

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That doesn't make sense. If it's a private road, wouldn't that mean you can place whatever you want on it? It's your road.

[-] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The developer never turned over the road to the North Carolina DOT after completion of the subdivision.

[-] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Just depends on the “they”. Local government wouldn’t touch it, the owners could have. I’d say it’s a slam dunk case against the owners for exactly that reason. Google ignored numerous reports so they may get some blame too.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
249 points (90.3% liked)

World News

32326 readers
523 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS