1284
submitted 1 year ago by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Soleos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I would say the greater achievement of right wing grifters is the connotation that "politics" is inherently bad and shameful, as implied by your comment as well.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It's bad but necessary. It would be great if we lived in a world where there was no need for government, therefore no need for government policy, and therefore no need to debate those policies.

But in the real world government is necessary therefore politics are necessary. The right wing confuses people with the belief that politics is bad and therefore should be eliminates. The left confuses people with the belief that politics should be good and because it isn't people should avoid participation.

Politics is ugly, and having unrealistic expectations for it is what blocks a lot of progress from happening. The right are better able to accomplish their goals through politics (even when their goals are harmful) because they have a better understanding of the ugliness. The left is oftentimes ineffective out of a silly desire to be above the ugliness of politics.

[-] Soleos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I see what you're saying in terms of idealism/naivete vs pragmatism. However I also get the sense that what you mean by government and politics is a bit different from what the left usually means. I'd be interested to understand what you mean by "politics" and "government".

A couple follow-up questions that might help clarify the distinctions

  1. does a society make choices between better and worse practice of politics/government?
  2. what would a world that doesn't need government look like if you were to imagine it?

The only part is disagree with is that the left encourages not participating in politics. I'm pretty sure a pillar of the left is encouraging informed participation in politics. Unless you mean punk/commie ideas of rejecting the establishment in favour of revolution? That's still participation in politics.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's the left that discourages participation in politics. The right discourages the left from participating in politics and all too often the left falls for it, hook line and sinker. The right has the "both sides" narratives down to a science, but despite promoting this kind of thinking, they always vote.

does a society make choices between better and worse practice of politics/government?

Yes. But it's not like ordering a product from Amazon. You don't put your desired improvements in a cart and have it delivered in two days. To accomplish the change you want in a democracy, you need to vote in many elections, sometimes over decades. If you really care you might want to join a major political party and discuss the issues important to you with them. Again this may take decades, but if the issue is important enough then you're willing to make that effort. Note how long the Christian right worked to get abortion banned. They didn't instantly get to have things their way it took voting in every election, attending party meetings, along with decades of apathy on the left.

what would a world that doesn’t need government look like if you were to imagine it?

Mad Max kinda shit. Do you prefer the leadership of Lord Humungus or Immorten Joe?

There will always be a government. We're a tribal species and we will form into tribes and war against one another if there is no one that sets the laws and enforces them. Those tribes would develop into a feudalistic society which may someday develop into a democracy again.

That whole Marxist "the state will whither away" thing is just pseudo religious belief comparable to the Christian belief in a rapture followed by an eternity of paradise. Which is why it's attractive to atheists that were formally Christians. Old habits and all that.

[-] Soleos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Huh, yeah we're probably in closer agreement that initially appeared. Some earlier bits in your other comments came across more "anti-politics"

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Well I see it as a necessary evil. If you have democracy you're gonna have politics. Hell you still have politics even without democracy, just a different kind and usually behind closed doors.

For me the phrase "politics is stupid but politics is important" sums it up best.

Politics is like taking a shit, it's messy and it stinks, but it's something you gotta deal with. And it's preferable to take a shower after it's been dealt with.

[-] Soleos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like you're splitting hairs, like saying all the shit parts of democracy are politics and all the not shit parts are somehow not politics. Democracy IS a part of politics. How about this, if you are to play devil's advocate for yourself, try listing 3 examples of how politics is good rather than evil.

My view is a bit different though. I see it more as an inherent property or process of society, like mass is to matter or spatial distribution of a flock of birds.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

No the political aspects are also shit. Democracy is shit too. It's just less shit than the alternatives. I think holding up democracy as some shining beacon of goodness leads to a lot of disappointment and disenfranchisement. Every system involving humans will be turned to shit, people will try to corrupt anything to gain personal advantage. But democracy is the best we're capable of having and if we make some effort to improve it, it will be less shit. Though still shitty because because politics makes things shitty.

[-] Soleos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think I've lost your meaning of shit/ty. It sounds like everything is shit. Life is shit, you're born, you suffer, you die shitty, etc. Which sounds edgy but doesn't really mean anything. What do you mean by shit/ty?

And at this point totally fair to call it here on this thread. It's just my gut reaction to your response.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah a lot of things are shit. It's weird to put politics (of all things) on a pedestal and try to see the world through the shittiest of lenses. There are plenty of things the world that are actually good and trying to make everything about politics is just making things shitty that otherwise wouldn't be.

[-] Soleos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's a bit of a strawman. The only people "putting politics on a pedestal" are human characatures, like people who's whole identity is worshipping Trump are to conservatives or "alpha males" to men.

Anyway I already gave my take on politics being a property more than a lens.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
1284 points (91.5% liked)

Memes

45890 readers
1414 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS