this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
841 points (98.5% liked)

internet funeral

7620 readers
4 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

!hmmm@lemmy.world with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on !surrealmemes@sh.itjust.works instead

• If your submission can be posted to !hmmm@lemmy.world (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca -5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Inherit a business that been successful for over a hundred years, and be the one to fuck it up so badly they have to close it down? Maybe they should feel bad.

I have no sympathy for anyone inheriting entire businesses.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago

Could've been a long time coming. Could've been that the previous owners were unethical and the current ones were not. It could be any number of things. It's not necessarily as simple as them "fucking up" and having to shut down.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

something something no wrong moves and still lose

There's a reason that, were it ever to happen, I'd stop at SVP level and not jump to C level.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So that you can get paid less and still have to shoulder all the blame?

C levels don't have to take responsibility except when it makes them look good.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

in my practical experience, thats not the case. it may be the case at $10B+ companies, but at <$99MM companies it's still much safer to draw a salary.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What a strange statement.

$10B+ companies, but at <$99MM

What about companies between $100m and $9.99b?

it's still much safer to draw a salary.

But ceos do pay themselves salaries.

This barely even makes sense and I really don't get what point you're trying to make.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

I was just casually commenting that I don't want to be in charge of a company because I'd rather the risk be on someone else's shoulder, and then when it was implied CEOs take no risk I clarified that the type of immune to failure CEO you're talking about are different from the average business.