419
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
419 points (92.0% liked)
Technology
60087 readers
2343 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Chill Maalus, I'm pretty clearly addressing 3rd degree burns, and only even mentioning 2nd degree burns in circumstances that are likely to increase their risk.
What part of this set you off, genuinely? Was it the reference of it as a risk? Was it that I actually looked at the facts? No part of me thinks this is good. This is very obviously and inarguably unacceptable, and no part of my post states otherwise.
Funny too that you ignore the post right next to mine that legitimately is minimizing it.
"chill dude it's clearly addressing the meat being charred and falling off the bone, and only mentioning potentially life threatening blisters in passing".
I mean, I didn't have anything to say with regards to the 2nd degree burns, really, so I didn't feel the need to comment on them. Didn't know any reply I made had to both acknowledge everything I agree with as well as make comment on what I feel was comment-worthy.
So I'll start now. I disagree with your lackadaisical portrayal of me. Neither is it accurate nor does it form a coherent argument against me. It simply acts as an ad hominem used in the place of a substantiated or communicated argument.
I agree with nothing in your non-statement.
Also characterizing 2nd degree burns on the hands as potentially life-threatening was irresponsible of pseudo-me. Pseudo-I shouldn't have done that, as it's untrue. Pseudo-me should know they're severe and serious, but something doesn't need to be described as "potentially life-threatening" to be severe and serious, and in fact, pseudo-me should be aware that this is a minimization of things that don't kill you but severely impact one's quality-of-life, as 2nd degree hand burns would.
Read up what 2nd and 3rd degree burns even are, then we can talk.
I can't say I actually want to talk to someone who takes me in the least favourable light possible, and goes off at me over their own misunderstanding.
Over whose misunderstanding? It was you who doesn't know what second and third degree burns are.