685
submitted 1 year ago by ezmack@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ezmack@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 year ago

I think 100k is the amount he still owes. Looks like he had a follow up or something that added $250 and insurance covered $175. Context is he had a seizure in the shower and was in the hospital for a month. A lot of plans you have co insurance after hitting your deductible where you split any further costs with the insurance company say 80/20. So it's possible he only ends up paying $20k of that, or his bill was much higher and $100k is what he owes after co insurance

[-] Saneless@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Usually there's still an out of pocket max, like $5000.

But I guess that could depend on your insurance

It's such a scam and the people voting against universal care are the same ones who complain they don't go to the doctor because it's too expensive

[-] RogueTyre@lemmy.fmhy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

People are voting against universal health care? Do people other than hospital and Pharma owners actually vote against that?

[-] silent_clash@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The propaganda is people "like" their private insurance and don't want to be "forced" to get rid of it. There is also an anti-tax streak that has existed since the 1700s (no taxation without representation, Boston tea party, etc) that lives on strongest in reactionary politics.

Edit: Oh and last time we tried to actually improve healthcare they scare mongered the public that there would be "government death panels" who decided whether you would get coverage. As opposed to the current reality where the death panels are real and run by private corporations.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is the tragic half-truth espoused by the corporate media claiming there are two sides to this issue.

Every time, they fail to complete the statement: “…give up private, but Medicare coverage will be better

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 3 points 1 year ago

I don't understand why getting rid of private insurance keeps being brought up. Afaik none of the proposed laws would remove it. The point should be that the universal healthcare is good enough you don't need private insurance.

In Canada there is provincial healthcare that everyone gets for free, and many people still have supplemental insurance (private or employer provided) to expand coverage for things like prescriptions, eye, and dental.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That’s such a great point. It’s not like single payer would close down private insurance companies. The truth is they would just become redundant and people would realize they’re not needed, then choose to stop wasting their money on them…unless they can pivot their business to provide additional and desirable service beyond what people get from universal coverage.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
685 points (96.7% liked)

Memes

45189 readers
1320 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS