68
submitted 1 year ago by Daryl76679@lemmy.ml to c/science@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, animal testing in science leads to “gruesome” animal deaths. The alternative is human testing. What would you prefer?

This whole story is an absolute beat up.

[-] kevin@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Animal testing need not be gruesome - and indeed must not be according to most IACUCs and IRB approvals.

Typically, minimizing animal suffering and humane procedures for determining when and how to euthanize animals is typically a big part of getting sign off for this kind of thing.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

“Gruesome” is just a clickbait word used here by whoever wrote the article.

[-] rob64@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

Given that it's the SEC being asked to investigate, it's not so much that the monkeys died gruesomely, but that Musk may have lied about it.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
68 points (94.7% liked)

Science

3217 readers
76 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS