744
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

A more elegant solution would be to slap on a massive tax for houses that are not the primary homestead of the owner. Make it possible for companies to build and sell, but make it super expensive to sit on them or rent them out.

With houses being sold at 3x what they were just a few years ago in my area, it's more profitable to leave half the houses empty than to sell them at a reasonable cost.

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I could get on board with that, as long as you account for situations where you might have bought a second house and moved, while still trying to sell the first. Technically you would still own two houses and I'd hate to see individuals punished for merely trying to sell their old house.

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
744 points (98.6% liked)

Personal Finance

3819 readers
2 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS