681
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] clearleaf@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

What's the problem with static linking if all this is considered worth the pain?

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Nothing in particular other than needing to update your builds when any single dependency has an important fix and still needing to build and maintain packaging for every single distro you support. For small applications shipping a static binary should be fine, but when you're talking about something like Chrome or Firefox that's a whole lot of overhead.

[-] the_sisko@startrek.website 0 points 11 months ago

It's also a mechanism to sandbox applications, which static linking can't do.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
681 points (93.6% liked)

linuxmemes

20705 readers
2033 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS