1750
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
1750 points (97.7% liked)
Technology
59654 readers
2853 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This is just absurd. Often times we are paying just as much as a physical copy and now Amazon can just randomly decide to remove that content? Sounds like theft to me
They always can; when they aren’t able to distribute anymore then they can’t distribute it
as much as I would love to blame it on Amazon it's not their fault they don't own the rights they are at the mercy of whoever does
Then they shouldn't "sell" it.
If they didn't someone else would. Literally every single copy of paid media that is for sale works like this. You likely don't know that because with physical media they're not likely to come into your home and take back the DVD or CD you bought from Tower Records before they company folded. But you still don't own that music or that movie. You own the right to enjoy it for the life of the media through which you purchased it. You don't have the right to demand another Taylor Swift CD because you scratched yours. If you should decide to make a backup copy, that's legal. But I didn't endure the entirety of the 90's with the FBI threatening me every five minutes every single time I watched a DVD or VHS tapes just so you could claim that companies shouldn't sell media the way they have always sold media. The medium is different and therefore they can retroactively go in and take it back but the terms are basically the same.
Stream a movie to a crowd without the proper licensing and see if the media company who owns it or the FBI get to you first.
If your country doesn't have an FBI it likely has an agency that handles this similarly and I'm happy to Google that agency and the terms under which they would seek any kind of arbitration or damages.
https://youtu.be/OzLmkAEpV2s?si=KkpWRirLgV6GOOyR
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/OzLmkAEpV2s?si=KkpWRirLgV6GOOyR
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
They really shouldn't be allowed to "sell" it but the same thing would happen if you bought something on Apple that Apple loses the rights to.
It is not their fault you don't understand fundamentally what you are purchasing. When you buy media (digital or physical) you are purchasing a license to enjoy that media indefinitely. However that license has limitations. For the consumer or the company selling the license. The company that actually owns the media is the one at fault. But everyone is mad at Amazon (or Apple, or Microsoft, or Google), instead of record labels or movie studios. The only reason a movie company won't come into your home and take back that copy of Shrek you bought from Tower Records back in the day is because it's cost prohibitive. They can legally do so though.
https://youtu.be/OzLmkAEpV2s?si=KkpWRirLgV6GOOyR
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/OzLmkAEpV2s?si=KkpWRirLgV6GOOyR
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.