163
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Business owner 'hires' ChatGPT for customer service, then fires the humans::Experts divided on whether a new wave of call centre automation will make for better jobs for people, or merely throw millions out of work

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 21 points 1 year ago

Which is just another reason upon the mountain of reasons that capitalism is a terrible system and cannot be allowed to continue

[-] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I agree with the anti-capitalist sentiment, your anger is misaimed. Forcibly keeping nonprofitable jobs which are easily replaceable by AI is contrary to contemporary marxian-derivative theories (see Bullshit jobs by David Graber). We, as a society should seize technical advancements such as AI and automation to let people work less while allowing them to afford life. Thus contemporary economists and modern monetary theories are more and more open to the idea of universal basic income.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 year ago

See my other response, your take is the same as mine and I'm not sure how it got misinterpreted.

Under capitalism automation hurts the working class and enriches the elite even more.

Under a socialist system automation would be celebrated as less work for society and the displaced workers would have no panic about not paying the bills while they find a more needed way to help society.

[-] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah I see your other comment now. I think the reason me and !bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works misunderstood your point is that the original comment you replied to said:

Sometimes jobs getting automated does not create sustainable jobs to replace them. That’s just going to happen more often as time goes on

to which you replied:

Which is just another reason upon the mountain of reasons that capitalism is a terrible system and cannot be allowed to continue

implying you oppose technological advancements of any sort if they create risk to peoples' jobs.

You think we should stop innovating so that call centre jobs are protected?

Weird take.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 10 points 1 year ago

You misunderstand my take.

Automation should be a GOOD thing.

But we live in a system in which you must work or starve. Automation takes away jobs faster than we can replace them (with equally or better paying jobs the displaced workers are qualified for).

Under a better system we would see automation as slightly less work for society with no drop in quality of life or even a rise in quality of life, while the displaced workers will have no mad scramble to be retrained before they can't pay rent.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

We've yet to run out of jobs, and life is measurably better for the vast majority of people compared to just a hundred years ago.

There is actually a shortage of labour in major economies

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 year ago

In terms of medically and technologically? Sure. I'd hands down rather be an average person today than in 1860 or whatever.

In terms of say, home ownership, age of retirement, weight, social life, financial security, time off, etc - things that actually make our now longer lives fufilling - how have those trended in the western world since say, the 40's?

If I took just one average job of these so many "available", could I support kids and have financial security in decent housing?

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://80000hours.org/2023/02/is-the-world-getting-better-or-worse/

High paying jobs go to highly skilled workers. If you want to earn more, learn more.

If you live in Germany, I'd say yes. Their home ownership levels are one of the lowest yet they are the richest in Europe and there are plenty of technical jobs that pay extremely well.

We are at a tipping point again where companies have had too much benefit from the productivity of labour. That balance will shift with more employees taking direct action, the same as it always does.

[-] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Hope you like your life. If everyone goes and gets a "high" paying job. No nurses doctors psychology counselling teachers fruit pickers cleaners garbage collectors civil servants police ambulance.

Your ignorance if woeful. We don't need 8 billion devs, bankers degenerate gamblers CEOs coders and aresholes. We need face to face people doing jobs only humans can do.

Stick your rich list up your ass

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Their wages haven't beaten inflation, now they're on strike.

I suggest you read up on the energy shock of the 1970s, it's very similar.

No need to be rude, cunt.

[-] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I know a lil bit about it. But how does that change what I said ? Who's on strike ? Lots of places are striking.

Because inflation and bubbles are starting to break. Hopefully will be a full meltdown soon. Gotta change the system.

Fair enough. You just seem entitled and I hate that. But fair. Gid cunt or bad ?

this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
163 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

59467 readers
3689 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS