763
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

I don't understand how you can say "you have to have a kid even if you can't support it" when it comes to abortion and then say "I don't want my taxes to help pay for your kid's food" when it comes to food assistance. The consequence is obviously going to be food insecurity for kids, why would you not want your tax money to help fix that? 8.4% of US kids are food insecure.

[-] Shush@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

The issue is that you're looking at it from a common sense view. They don't share it. They just decided this is what they believe in, and will oppose anything else. It doesn't have to make sense for them.

[-] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah the reactionaries are definitely a big component of the problem here. Opposing progress in all its forms even if it's oxymorinic to do so.

load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
763 points (100.0% liked)

196

16501 readers
2091 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS