1023
submitted 11 months ago by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Globulart@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Jesus christ mate. All that to make a near identical point to the person you argued with.

What a waste of effort.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I wrote a comment that ought to have been received as extremely straightforward and uncontroversial. Its length was only about twenty words.

There was no reason it needed to become a problem.

[-] Globulart@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You're absolutely right! You then interpreted a response which agreed with you as a problem though, and everything that followed made you look a right tool.

Someone was literally just pointing out that the stigmatisation is ironic given the same logic used in the idiom could be applied to many industries. They acknowledged that it wasn't, and that the stigma was associated specifically to sex workers, but basically were just having a chuckle that the logic used to denigrate a whole industry could be just as easily applied to lots of "respected" career paths too.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
1023 points (97.2% liked)

Antiwork

7692 readers
68 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS