1457
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 106 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I see the point they're trying to make, what this person is actually saying is complete nonsense.

Graceful degradation is not the opposite of planned obsolescence they're two completely different concepts with nothing to do with each other.

Graceful degradation is where a product degrades in such a way as to maintain at least some functionality for as long as possible.

Planned obsolescence is where an item is intentionally designed to fail in order to get you to buy the next version.

Completely different concepts.

The actual opposite of graceful degradation, is progressive enhancement.

[-] lorty@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago

Yes, you could have both ideas in the same product: it retains some functionality as it fails, but it fails in a planned way to ensure it's lifespan is short enough.

[-] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

And oddly, the example of the flashlight isn’t even an example of either. Support for heterogeneous batteries is a feature, but it’s a stretch to call it “degradation”. It’s not like batteries fail randomly before they run out of juice.

[-] BluesF@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

The degradation in this case happens in the brain when you're trying to remember which type of batteries you need

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

I feel like the opposite is your multifunction refusing to scan because it needs ink.

[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago
[-] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Malicious degredation.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
1457 points (97.7% liked)

Solarpunk technology

2367 readers
2 users here now

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS