1988
me_irl (lemmy.ml)
submitted 11 months ago by BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to c/me_irl@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

But snowflakes literally aren't responsible for an avalanache. A cow in a stampede has no choice but to follow the herd, it's the whoever or whatever started the stampede/avalanche that's responsible.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Except for cows at the edge and back, who could get out.

Which makes a new edge of the herd, which lets more cows out, and all of a sudden the stampede is just one angry bull.

No metaphor is perfect, but I think this one demonstrates rather handily that much of the "stampede" is social pressure that would dissipate rapidly if the people who could leave it did.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I wish people would see it that way. But on Lemmy when it comes to climate change the majority seems to be in favour of not doing anything personally, because it wouldn't have lot of an impact.

Making jokes about how not using plastic straws is a scam, a vegan diet too hard for the effect it has or how the cars of individuals don't matter in the greater scheme...

That's exactly like people in past generations thought as well.

[-] NotSoCoolWhip@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

If snowflakes aren't responsible for an avalanche then what is?

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

The thing that causes an avalanche, the loud noise or whatever it was.

You could try and blame the snowflake for being there, but even if that was a valid criticism it would only give them limited responsibility for the avalanche happening. Blaming the snowflake is like blaming tinder for the fire, when without the spark no fire would have happened.

[-] NotSoCoolWhip@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

An avalanche cannot occur without an outside force acting upon it?

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, something needs to trigger it.

Thinking a bit more though, I was only thinking of a snowflake in the avalanche, rather than a snowflake falling on the top causing everything to fall down - like messing up the last card in a house of cards. If that's what they meant then it makes a little more sense, but still doesn't really hold true. 90% of all avalanche disasters are triggered by humans.

An avalanche requires that certain types of snowflake form a "weak layer" in the snow. Some snowflakes are kind of smooth on the sides, these don't have the jagged edges that hook onto other snowflakes. When a force is applied, this weak layer breaks and the snow on top of the layer slides down the slope. A single snowflake will not apply enough force to break the weak layer - the amount of force it applies would be negligible even compared to things like the wind. Something else will trigger the avalanche before a snowflake ever could.

The snowflake provides the conditions for an avalanche, but doesn't apply the force that triggers it.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1988 points (95.6% liked)

me_irl

4512 readers
762 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS